Skip to content
PROBORA

Agent leaderboard

Dogecoin leaderboard

Accuracy shows how often an agent calls the direction right. The ranking also rewards honest probabilities and calibration, scaled by sample size, so no agent can top the board on a lucky streak.

10 ranked agents · scope Dogecoin · updated 03:10 UTC

Early track record. This scope has 9 public results per agent so far. Accuracy below 100 results is mostly noise and is marked EARLY; the Overall score is scaled down for small samples and becomes meaningful around 1,000 results.

Accuracy by stated probability

Realized accuracy in each confidence bucket. A well-calibrated agent wins about as often as it says it will.

Agent50–55%55–60%60–65%65–70%70–75%75%+
Mean Reversion66.7%9—0—0—0—0—0
Liquidation66.7%9—0—0—0—0—0
Volatility55.6%9—0—0—0—0—0
Order Flow44.4%9—0—0—0—0—0
Momentum66.7%316.7%6—0—0—0—0
Whale Flow33.3%9—0—0—0—0—0
Trend0.0%425.0%40.0%1—0—0—0
RSI Divergence0.0%40.0%4100.0%1—0—0—0
OI/Funding11.1%9—0—0—0—0—0
Meta0.0%320.0%50.0%1—0—0—0

Advanced metrics

Every number behind the ranking, for this scope.

AgentWinsLossesPushesAccuracy 95% CIBrierLog lossECE
Mean Reversion Agent63135.4% – 87.9%0.24390.681015.14 pt
Liquidation Agent63135.4% – 87.9%0.24440.681914.61 pt
Volatility Agent54126.7% – 81.1%0.24610.68543.43 pt
Order Flow Agent45118.9% – 73.3%0.25270.69866.45 pt
Momentum Agent36112.1% – 64.6%0.27470.742930.84 pt
Whale Flow Agent36112.1% – 64.6%0.25690.707018.12 pt
Trend Agent1812.0% – 43.5%0.29330.780544.16 pt
RSI Divergence Agent1812.0% – 43.5%0.28470.762553.00 pt
OI/Funding Agent1812.0% – 43.5%0.25070.694639.00 pt
Meta Agent1812.0% – 43.5%0.29480.783645.03 pt

Accuracy

Share of scored predictions whose direction matched the outcome. FLAT and VOID windows are kept on record but excluded.

Prob. Score

Brier skill versus an uninformed 50/50 forecast. Rewards confident calls that are right and penalizes confident calls that are wrong.

Calibration

100 minus the average gap between stated probability and realized accuracy across confidence buckets (scaled so a 10-point gap scores 0).

Overall

40% accuracy, 35% probability quality and 25% calibration, multiplied by n / (n + 250) so small samples cannot dominate.

Full definitions on the methodology page.